INTRODUCTION
In 2023, 6-methyl nicotine (6MN), a synthetic nicotine analog, was introduced in US-marketed electronic cigarette products advertised as exempt from FDA regulation1. Since then, several disposable e-cigarette products and refill liquids containing 6MN appeared on the US market, with the compound branded ‘Metatine’ or ‘Nixotine’, the latter mixed with nicotinamide2. An additional trademark, ‘Imotine’, was registered for 6MN, marketed by the company Novel Compounds3-5. In preclinical studies, 6MN was found to be at least three times more potent than nicotine at eliciting characteristic behaviors, with a lower median lethal dose, raising concerns about increased addictiveness and toxicity1. Its effects on humans remain to be assessed.
It is unknown whether the use of 6MN has spread to other product categories, including oral nicotine pouches (ONP) or other oral products such as gums and lozenges. ONP represents a new tobacco product category with rapidly growing sales in the US and worldwide6. Here, we aimed to identify US-marketed nicotine analogue-containing products in categories beyond electronic cigarettes.
Industry reports, Google Patents, and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) database were searched for information, patent applications, and trademarks for 6-methyl nicotine products. Identified trademarks ‘Metatine’, ‘Nixotine’, ‘Imotine’ and ‘6-methyl nicotine’ (and variations thereof) were used as search terms to identify US-marketed 6MN products. Identified ONP products were purchased from web merchants to confirm availability. Information on ingredient content was reviewed and compared with ingredients in market-leading ONP products. Marketing and safety claims were reviewed, and regulatory statements were assessed in context with regulations of US states, especially California, and federal laws and regulations.
COMMENTARY
We used the search terms ‘Metatine’, ‘Nixotine’ or ‘Imotine’ to search for newly introduced 6MN-containing products marketed by web merchants in the US. In August 2024, we identified two US-based brands, ‘MG’ and ‘Hippotine’ pouches, advertised to contain ‘Imotine’. No ‘Metatine’, or ‘Nixotine’ pouch products were identified, and no products of other categories (gums, lozenges, etc.) with nicotine analogs were identified.
‘MG’ pouches are marketed by Upperdeckys.com, a vendor of caffeine-containing ‘Energy’ pouches. ‘Hippotine’ pouches are marketed by the web merchant Happyhippo.com, a vendor of Kratom7,8. Kratom is an herbal extract designated by FDA as an unapproved product with strong consumer warnings of the risk of serious adverse events9.
MG Pouches are marketed in four flavors: Cool Mint (8 mg Imotine per pouch), Buzzin Berry (8 mg), Wintergreen (15 mg), and Orange Creamsicle (25 mg) (Table 1). Hippotine-branded pouches are marketed in two flavors: Guava Juice (15 mg Imotine per pouch) and Wintergreen (25 mg) (Table 1). Fruit and sweet dessert flavors (Buzzin Berry, Orange Creamsicle, Guava Juice) are especially known to appeal to youth and young adult nicotine pouch users10.
Table 1
The listed 6-methyl nicotine contents of the newly introduced products are either identical to (8 mg) or by far exceed (15 mg, 25 mg), the maximal nicotine contents of the most popular US-marketed nicotine pouch products (Zyn, Velo, On!), marketed in strengths of 1.5–8 mg (Table 1)11-14. The ingredients listed on the back of the cans are almost identical across both product lines, containing: coconut fiber (MG) or coconut coir (Hippotine), vegetable glycerin, palm oil, xylitol, natural flavor, water, ImotineTM, sodium carbonate, xanthan gum, stevia, and salt, suggesting they are produced by the same manufacturer.
Vendor websites and product packaging provide extensive addiction and health warnings (Figure 1, Table 2). Some statements refer to the differences in chemistry between 6MN and nicotine and its potential addictiveness and toxicity: ‘ImotineTM is chemically distinct from nicotine. It may still be addictive, may have a toxicity profile similar to Nicotine, and should only be used by current adult tobacco users and never by minors (Persons under the age of 21)’8.
Table 2
Health warnings refer to potential risks during pregnancy and breastfeeding, existing health conditions, and possible medication interactions (Figure 1, Table 2).
Additionally, a warning usually not associated with tobacco products is included: ‘Warning: Do not operate a vehicle or heavy machinery when taking this product’ (Figure 1).
Both brands make statements likely aimed to pre-empt regulatory measures. For example: ‘This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease or condition’, likely addressing potential regulation of the products by FDA as drugs (Figure 1)8. The vendor also states that ‘ImotineTM is not considered a tobacco product’, suggesting that tobacco regulatory restrictions do not apply15. Hippotine pouches are advertised as: ‘Available to Californians (not subject to flavored pouch restriction)’, aiming to undermine California’s ban on characterizing flavors that extend to oral nicotine pouches7. The products are likely illegal in California since new legislation was enacted in the state on 28 September 2024, that deems 6MN a form of nicotine under state tobacco regulatory authority16.
Strength and limitations
The strength of the present study is its use of a wide range of identified trademark names for nicotine analogs in the search for novel products. However, the marketplace is dynamic; new brands and trademarks may have emerged, and some products might have been missed. Conclusions regarding the potential toxicity of the identified products are limited by the incomplete knowledge of 6MN’s health effects in humans and the lack of independent verification of 6MN product contents. Future chemical analysis studies will enable approaches for more accurate human risk assessment.
CONCLUSION
The spread of nicotine analogs to additional product categories, such as oral pouches, is concerning, especially because of the high listed 6MN contents of the newly introduced products. Given the higher potency of 6MN compared to nicotine in pharmacological studies, regulators need to rapidly assess the potential public health threats associated with these products1. Legislators and regulators also need to provide certainty about the regulatory status of nicotine analogs to prevent further erosion of flavor bans and other regulations.