CONFERENCE PROCEEDING
Interventions for tobacco, alcohol, and cannabis cessation in pregnancy: considerations for design and implementation
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
2
Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS). Santiago de Compostela, Spain
3
Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public health, Madrid, Spain
Publication date: 2023-04-25
Corresponding author
Andrea Vila-Farinas
Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2023;9(Supplement):A152
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
During pregnancy only half of women quit tobacco smoking despite the
recommendations and strategies implemented. The consumption of cannabis and
binge drinking seems to be rising in the last years. The objective of this study was to
explore the perception of the main actors regarding the development and
implementation of an enhanced intervention for tobacco, alcohol and cannabis
cessation in Spain.
Material and Methods:
A qualitative study was conducted using a phenomenological approach. The
target population was: 1) policy and decision makers 2) health professionals involved
in cessation and, 3) pregnant women-couples using tobacco, alcohol or cannabis. The
information was collected in 2022, through 2 focus groups and 8 in-depth interviews.
Data were collected until discourse saturation was reached and accurately transcribed.
Exploratory analysis and inductive open coding were performed, codes were grouped
into categories and subcategories were identified.
Results:
Eight policy and decision makers, 9 health professionals and 8 pregnant
women/couples took part. The analysis identified 5 categories and 20 subcategories
Among the categories identified are the preferences of participants regarding
interventions, the information provided or the acceptable cessation goals were
identified. Decision makers & health professionals agreed on a brief motivational
intervention and pregnant women preferred interventions combined with counseling,
leaflets or social support. Women were against digital interventions and shocking
messages. They also considered that at least the first intervention should be face-toface
and the information provided should focus on the real risks that consumption
implies for mother and partner.
Conclusions:
The key considerations identified regarding the preferences and expectations of the participants on smoking, alcohol and cannabis interventions should
be taken into consideration whilst acknowledging that some of these considerations
might be context-dependent.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
FUNDING
All phases of this study were supported by the Government Delegation for the National Plan on Drugs (Spain) grant, 2021I009.