CONFERENCE PROCEEDING
Effectiveness of behavior change
interventions for smoking cessation among
expectant and new fathers: Findings from a
systematic review
More details
Hide details
1
School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
2
Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
3
Department of Sustainable Environmental Health Sciences, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
Publication date: 2022-07-05
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2022;8(Supplement):A113
ABSTRACT
Background:
Smoking cessation during pregnancy and postpartum period by
both women and their partners offers multiple health benefits.
However, compared to pregnant/post-partum women, their
partners are less likely to actively seek smoking cessation services.
There is an increased recognition about the importance of tailored
approaches to smoking cessation for expectant and new fathers.
While Behavior Change Interventions (BCIs) are a promising
approach for smoking cessation, evidence on its effectiveness
exclusively among expectant and new fathers is fragmented and
does not allow for many firm conclusions to be drawn.
Objective:
To conduct a systematic review on effectiveness of BCIs on
smoking cessation outcomes offered to expectant and new fathers
(child <1 year) both through individual and/or couple-based
interventions.
Methods:
Peer reviewed articles were identified from eight databases. Two
reviewers independently conducted screening, data extraction
and quality assessment.
Results:
Of the 1222 studies identified, 9 RCTs (involving 4681 men) were
included in the study. The intervention targets were mixed, with
5 studies targeting expectant/new fathers, 3 targeting couples
and 1 primarily targeting women with intervention component
to men. While the follow up measurements for men varied within
the studies, majority of studies reported biochemically verified
quit rates at 6 months. Most of the interventions were found to
be effective and showed small effects on cessation outcomes. BCI
approaches in interventions were heterogenous across studies.
Findings are suggestive of gender specific interventions being
more likely to have positive outcomes.
Conclusions:
This review suggests that use of the BCI approach for smoking
cessation among expectant and new fathers is effective. However,
more studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base to
inform policy and practice. Further, there is a need to identify
how smoking cessation service delivery can better address the
needs of (both) gender(s) during pregnancy – ‘an opportune time
for offering smoking cessation interventions’.