CONFERENCE PROCEEDING
Challenges and successes in the sustainment of community-level smoking cessation interventions for residents with a low socioeconomic position
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
2
IVO Research Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands
3
Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
4
Dutch Expert Centre for Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Publication date: 2023-04-25
Corresponding author
Nikita L. Poole
Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2023;9(Supplement):A80
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
When health promotion interventions are implemented, the gains are often short-lived, as interventions are seldom successfully sustained. The current study aims to explore how and under what conditions community-level smoking cessation interventions for people with a lower socioeconomic position can be sustained, drawing upon interventions delivered in Dutch neighbourhoods with a predominantly low socioeconomic position.
Material and Methods:
We conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders from three community-level smoking cessation interventions implemented at least three years prior. The topic guide was developed based on the Determinants of Innovation framework and transcripts were analysed thematically.
Results:
We identified several factors that promote the sustainment of smoking cessation community-level interventions: 1) structural, long-term funding through the commitment of health insurers and policy makers; 2) continued stakeholder enthusiasm and involvement; 3) training and time for professionals to discuss smoking cessation, thereby also increasing the visibility of the intervention for professionals and residents; 4) integrating the intervention with existing initiatives and adapting it to be compatible with current working practices of executive staff; and 5) planning for sustainment as a team from the offset.
Conclusions:
The current study highlights challenges and successes in intervention sustainment for people with a lower socioeconomic position. Lack of structural funding was one of the most challenging aspects for intervention sustainment in which health insurers and policy makers can play an important role. Planning for sustainment from the offset would enable intervention coordinators to consider the abovementioned factors early on. This need not be done alone but can best be discussed within a team of stakeholders. We will present our findings with examples from practice.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.