CONFERENCE PROCEEDING
A scoping review on policies to reduce
tobacco availability by regulating retail
environment
More details
Hide details
1
Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
2
Bath University, Bath, United Kingdom
3
King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
4
University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Publication date: 2022-07-05
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2022;8(Supplement):A110
ABSTRACT
Background:
In 2005, the World Health Organization Framework Convention
on Tobacco Control (FCTC) entered into force. This treaty was
developed in response to the global tobacco epidemic, and it
includes measures to reduce both demand for and supply of
tobacco. The measures related to demand reduction include
raising tax, providing cessation services, promoting smokefree
public places, banning advertising, and raising awareness.
However, there are a limited number of measures for supply
reduction, and these mainly include fighting illicit trade, banning sales to minors and providing alternatives to tobacco workers
and growers. Unlike regulation of many other goods and services
that have been subjected to retail restrictions, there is a lack of
resources about restricting tobacco availability through regulation
of tobacco retail environment.
Objective:
Considering the potential of retail environment regulations in
reducing tobacco supply and consequently reducing tobacco use,
this scoping review aims to identify relevant measures.
Methods:
This scoping review examines interventions, policies, and
legislation to regulate tobacco retail environment to reduce
tobacco availability. This was done by searching all FCTC and its
Conference of Parties decisions, a grey literature search including
tobacco control databases, a scoping communication with the
focal points of the 182 FCTC Parties, and a databases search in
PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Global Health, and Web
of Science.
Results:
Themes of measures were identified to reduce tobacco availability
by regulating retail environment: FCTC and non-FCTC measures.
Studies show the effects of regulation of the retail environment in
influencing overall tobacco purchases, and there is strong evidence
that having fewer retails reduces the level of impulse purchasing of
cigarettes and tobacco goods. The measures covered by FCTC are
much more implemented than ones not covered by it. Although not
widely implemented, many themes of limiting tobacco availability
by regulating tobacco retail environment are available.
Conclusions:
Further studies to assess such measures, and the adoption of
the effective ones to be covered under FCTC decisions would
probably increase their adoption by many countries. There is a
need for exploring regulating retail environment to reduce tobacco
availability and its supply as a theme to be adopted globally for
tobacco control.